Raoul calls ruling blocking SAFE-T law ‘severely flawed’ in new petition


The Illinois Attorney General’s Office filed opening arguments in the state’s Supreme Court on Thursday, seeking to overturn a judge’s ruling that parts of the controversial SAFE-T law were unconstitutional.

One of the goals of the landmark criminal justice bill was to eliminate cash bail in the state. This made Illinois the first state in the nation to do so.

The bail reform was scheduled to take effect from January 1, but stopped at the last minute After Kankakee County Chief Justice Thomas Cunnington backed a group of prosecutors and sheriff’s offices against the law.

Opponents filed 64 nearly identical cases challenging the reform known as the Pretrial Fairness Act, but they were consolidated into one case before Kankakee County Chief Justice Thomas W. Cunnington.

On December 28, Cunnington ruled that, except for certain crimes, the defendant was part of an act that violated the state constitution’s requirement to be released on bail “on adequate security.” , also found that it violated the separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature.

“The adequacy of bail is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts and is not determined by statutory law.” In the ruling, Cunnington wrote:.

In Thursday’s filing, Attorney General Kwame Raul’s office argued that Cunnington’s decision was “flawed” and that the state’s constitution requires Illinois to “maintain a monetary bail system.” He claimed he didn’t.

“The Circuit Court’s opposing decision should be reversed,” the Bureau argued.

According to the Attorney General’s Office, state bail constitutional language seeks to generally guarantee the right of a defendant who is presumed innocent to seek pretrial release while the case is pending.

It argued that the wording did not explicitly include monetary bail. He argued that history was on its side.

At the time, the Attorney General’s Office said the defendants’ continued appearances were ensured by their friends and family’s promises to ensure that they would appear at trial.

Raul’s office also cited a dictionary definition of bail that dates back before the United States was a country that had never linked bail to the act of placing cash deposits.

“Certainly, defendants released before trial, or ‘bailed’, have historically been subject to both financial and non-monetary terms intended to ensure that they appear at trial.” He was released. But the law’s pretrial release clause allows courts to do just that,” the attorney general’s office argued.

The filing also argues that key case law empowers the legislature to set policy, and that Cunnington’s reasoning for finding the act violated separation of powers was “grossly flawed.” ” he said.

The Supreme Court argued that “the General Assembly never held that it unjustly violated its powers by setting the conditions under which it could exercise them.”

Opponents of the law must submit their responses by February 17. Oral arguments are scheduled for March, but no date has been set.

In addition to reforming the bail system,safety law It also addresses long-standing public safety issues, some of which are already affecting us. The regulation stipulates that all police officers in the state must be equipped with body-worn cameras to extend services to victims of crime.


What do you think?

Written by Natalia Chi

Chicago Popular; Chicago breaking news, weather and live video. Covering local politics, health, traffic and sports for Chicago, the suburbs and northwest Indiana.

Leave a Reply

Jury awards $1 million to Oregon woman who was told ‘I don’t serve black people’ while trying to get gas

Bulls Continue to Fall for Fewer Teams as Trade Deadline Approaches